Webb v. United States

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 13, 1960.

Decided Jan. 18, 1960.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-01-18

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1988

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. 72.71 Acres of Land

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1960-01-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1John C. Webb, pro se.

¶2Hugh Nugent, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leon H. A. Pierson, U. S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., and S. Billingsley Hill, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.

¶3Before SOPER, HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Affirmed upon the opinion of the District Court, United States v. 72.71 Acres of Land, etc., 23 F.R.D. 635.

¶6Affirmed.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Clement Furman Haynsworth Jr.
Chief Judge
Herbert Stephenson Boreman
Circuit Judge
Morris Ames Soper
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

John C. Webb, pro se.

Hugh Nugent, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leon H. A. Pierson, U. S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., and S. Billingsley Hill, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.