Jackson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
273 F.2d 521 · 1959
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
June 1968
most recently cited
25 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mallory v. United States · United States v. Bayer · Upshaw v. United States · LundBerg v. Bannan · Remington v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Jackson’s signing of the document cannot in any way be considered an independent act based upon proper counsel or as occurring after time for deliberate reflection. Rather, the signature was obtained as a result of a purposeful process of inquiry undertaken during a period of unlawful detention. Therefore, the challenged confession should have been excluded.” Jackson v. United States, 273 F.2d 521, at p. 523 . 2”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Jackson’s signing of the document cannot in any way be considered an independent act based upon proper counsel or as occurring after time for deliberate reflection. Bather, the signature was obtained as a result of a purposeful process of inquiry undertaken during a period of unlawful detention.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.