Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

273 F. App'x 217

Lamb v. Astrue

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 9, 2008

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-04-09

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2008-04-09

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Robert Emerson Lamb applied to proceed in forma pauperis. After Lamb filed the Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit and answered each question asked, the district court denied in forma pauperis status, stating that Lamb had sufficient income to pay a filing fee. Lamb was last employed in January 2007, and now receives disability benefits that, at their maximum, total $637 per month. Lamb asserted living expenses of $395 per month, but did not include in his expenses an accounting for medical care, clothing, gas, or other ordinary expenses beyond rent, food, and phone service. On this basis, we conclude Lamb is not able to pay the $350 filing fee. Thus, the district court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we grant in forma pauperis status on appeal, vacate the order of the district court, and remand with directions to allow Lamb to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 VACATED AND REMANDED.

/273/fappx/217 · .json · Public domain