Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 FSUPP2D 351 - In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Research Reports Securities Litigation

In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Research Reports Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

126
cited by 126 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78N (§ 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Hishon v. King & Spalding · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Albright v. Oliver · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 126 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) facts alleged in the complaint and documents attached to it or incorporated in it by reference, (2) documents "integral" to the complaint and relied upon in it, even if not attached or incorporated by reference, (3) documents or information contained in [the] defendant's motion papers if plaintiff has knowledge or possession of the material and relied on it in framing the complaint, (4) public disclosure documents required by law to be, and that have been, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and (5) facts of which judicial notice may properly be taken under Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.”
    29 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(4) Loss Causation In any private action arising under this chapter, the plaintiff shall have the burden of proving that the act or omission of the defendant alleged to violate this chapter caused the loss for which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he district court . . . could have viewed [the documents] on the motion to dismiss because there was undisputed notice to plaintiffs of their contents and they were integral to plaintiffs' claim”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.