Osias v. Decker’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1225 (§ 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229 (§ 239 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Gustafson v. Alloyd Co. · Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. Mezei · Zadvydas v. Davis · Clark Field Office Director Seattle Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al. v. Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the examining immigration officer determines that an alien seeking admission is not clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted ... for a [removal] proceeding under section 1229a of this title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“was decided under a prior immigration statutory regime that considered immigration in terms of 'entry' and 'exclusion,' rather than the current statutory regime's consideration of 'admission.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Lett v. Decker“the length of Petitioner's detention without an individualized bond hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.