Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 Ill. App. 3d 866 - Smith v. Haran

273 Ill. App. 3d 866 - Smith v. Haran’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2021

10 state decisions

601995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 159 Ill. 2d 193 - Hoem v. Zia · 26 Wash. 2d 346 - Martin v. Shaen · 3 Ill. App. 2d 281 - Mock v. Higgins · Karlos v. Pappas · In Re Estate of Mason

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the trial of any action in which any party sues or defends as the representative of a deceased person * * *, no adverse party or person directly interested in the action shall be allowed to testify on his or her own behalf to any conversation with the deceased * * * or to any event which took place in the presence of the deceased * * *.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[t]o sanction the [defendants'] direct testimony that no money was ever exchanged * * * clearly and impermissibly defeats the purposes of the [Dead-Man's] Act and judicially repeals its provisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[T]estimony that one did not do a certain act is equivalent, for purposes of the Act, to testimony that he or she did the act and is prohibited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.