Abrams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
December 1998
most recently cited
37 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Birkla v. State · Guardiola v. State · Williams v. State · Doss v. State · Thompkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““... We have often held that arguments in appellate briefs must be discernible and cogent and must demonstrate how the alleged error harmed defendant. Guardiola v. State, (1978) Ind., 375 N.E.2d 1105 ; Williams v. State, (1973) 260 Ind. 543 , 297 N.E.2d 805 . These arguments must also be supported by appropriate legal authority according to our appellate rules, and noncompliance with the rules can result in the waiver of errors on review. Ind.R.App.P. 8.3(A)(7); Guardiola v. State, supra; Hendrix v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 309 , 315 N.E.2d 701 . Since there is no argument or legal authority in support of this issue, the issue is not properly presented to us and is therefore not before us for decision.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Manning v. Allgood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.