Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Williams v. Duckworth (1984), Baxter v. State (1988)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Henderson v. State · Jones v. State · Monserrate v. State · Williams v. State · McKee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We have clearly held that the purpose of the alibi statute is not to compel the exclusion of evidence or. mandate retrials for purely technical errors. Reversal is not required unless the accused was misled in the preparation or maintenance of his defense or was likely to be placed in double jeopardy.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State · Griffin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.