¶1dissenting.
¶2I dissent and would remand the case with instructions to enter a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Lynn v. State, (1979) Ind., 392 N.E.2d 449, 453.
273 Ind. 581
406 N.E.2d 256
Decided July 3, 1980
Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1980-07-03
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1985
10 state decisions
Relies on Lynn v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-07-03
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1dissenting.
¶2I dissent and would remand the case with instructions to enter a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Lynn v. State, (1979) Ind., 392 N.E.2d 449, 453.