State v. Schuster’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 23 U.S.C. § 161
Relies on Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · In Re the Marriage of Killman · Director of Taxation v. Kansas Krude Oil Reclaiming Co. · In re L.A. · Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The legislature is not 15 involved in the placement or numbering of statutes, and it is long established that '[t]he placement of a law in a particular location in the General Statutes by the compiler is not persuasive as to the intent of the legislature which enacted the statute.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.