Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 NJSUPER 111 - State v. DiTolvo

State v. DiTolvo’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wardius v. Oregon · Fellerman v. Bradley · United States v. Paxson · State v. Montague · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant shall provide the State with all relevant material, including, but not limited to ... the names, addresses, and birthdates of those persons known to defendant who may be called as witnesses at trial and their written statements, if any, including memoranda reporting or summarizing their oral statements. [R. 3:13—3(b)(2)(C).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.