Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 NJSUPER 572 - State v. Harvey

State v. Harvey’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 128 N.J. Super. 488 - State v. Beatty · 43 N.J. Super. 386 - Lipschitz v. State · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “R. 3:21-8 expresses the public policy of the State and should be liberally construed. Defendant was detained in a New York institution because of action taken by New Jersey, and whether that action finds its source in the robbery charge or the violation of parole charge is in our view immaterial. We accordingly hold that defendant is entitled to receive credit against his sentences for the 166 days that he was detained in the New York penal institution. [.Ibid.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As long as the warrant is lodged, a parolee cannot be released. Thus the confinement is attributable to the original sentence. If the warrant is withdrawn or parole is not revoked and the defendant is not returned to custody, then jail time is credited against the new sentence. [ 273 N.J.Super. at 576 , 642 A.2d 1052 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.