State v. McCormick’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2015
18 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Zablocki v. Redhail · Hyde v. United States · Hyde v. United States · Johnston v. United States · 58 Wis. 2d 269 - Shier v. Freedman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A person may be convicted and sentenced under the law of this state if: "(1) He commits an offense in whole or in part within this state; or "(2) Being without the state, he causes, aids or abets another to commit a crime within the state; or "(3) Being without the state, he intentionally causes a result within the state prohibited by the criminal laws of this state. "It is not a defense that the defendant's conduct is also a criminal offense under the laws of another state or of the United States or of another country." Minn.St. 609.025 The Minnesota Supreme Court held, "[w]e do not find in these statutes adequate grounds for disregarding limitations on extra-territorial jurisdictions which have long been recognized as the law of the land." Id., at p. 625.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Sykes v. State · State v. Simion“"* * * [T]he act of omission in non-support cases arises out of a fundamental obligation imposed on a parent at the time when the court had in personam jurisdiction. The situs of that obligation originates and remains with the residence of the child. Strong public policy supports jurisdiction to enforce that right wherever the child is domiciled." State v. McCormick, Minn., 273 N.W.2d 624, 627 (1978).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rios v. State“* * * Defendant constitutionally and historically can only be tried in the district where the crime occurred, a right which experience demonstrates is designed to further the ends of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rios v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.