273 Or. App. 228 - State v. Rabanales-Ramos’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person commits the offense of operating a motor vehicle while using a mobile communication device if the person, while operating a motor vehicle on a highway, uses a mobile communication device.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[n]o law shall violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search, or seizure[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a text messaging device or a wireless, two-way communication device designed to receive and transmit voice or text communication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.