Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 ORAPP 263 - State v. Vanornum

State v. Vanornum’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “serves the ends of justice by ensuring that defendant has the opportunity to have a trial with a jury that has been correctly instructed on the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[t]he gravity of the error and the ends of justice require that we exercise our discretion to correct the instructional error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the instructional error substantially affected the [party's] rights and require[s] reversal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.