273 Or. App. 310 - SAIF Corp. v. Traner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Although the novelty of the questions is demonstrated by the principal opinion and this opinion on fees, this matter was not extraordinary, all in all. Legal issues were routine, claimant was not deprived of receiving any compensation, and the insurer's disagreement was reasoned and in good faith. The presumptive limit on a fee award was a risk to claimant that was apparent at the outset, and it represents the same legislative policy expressed in the provision creating the right to fees ."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 297 Or. App. 284 - Saif Corp. v. Siegrist (In re Comp. of Siegrist)

2. “absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 297 Or. App. 284 - Saif Corp. v. Siegrist (In re Comp. of Siegrist)