Dawson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 64 Okla. Crim. 84 - Ex Parte Thompson · 4 Okla. Crim. 101 - In Re Williams · 70 Okla. Crim. 1 - Wilkins v. State · 6 Okla. Crim. 492 - Scott v. State · 68 Okla. Crim. 308 - Ashcraft v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The proof of payment of the special tax required by the United States government from retáil liquor dealers, together with the proof of possession of intoxicating liquors, is sufficient to sustain a convicton of one charged with having unlawful possession of such liquor, with intent to sell the same.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Skaggs v. State“of an intention to convey, sell or otherwise dispose of such liquors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“except for the personal use of the possessor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.