Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 P.2d 880 - Darks v. State

Darks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 1981
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1981

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

901954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · 63 Okla. Crim. 84 - Chesser v. State · 71 Okla. Crim. 162 - Presnell v. State · 30 Okla. Crim. 330 - Welch v. State · 87 Okla. Crim. 391 - Passmore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘“If a . . . peace officer arrest a person without a warrant, he is not bound to show in his justification a felony actually committed, to render the arrest lawful, but if he suspects one on his own knowledge of facts; or upon facts communicated to him by others, and thereupon he has reasonable ground to believe that the accused has been guilty of felony, the arrest is not unlawful.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““A peace officer may, without a warrant, arrest a person: "1. For a public offense, committed or attempted in his presence. “2. When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in his presence. “3. When a felony has in fact been committed, and he has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have committed it. “4. On a charge made upon reasonable cause, of the commission of a felony by the party arrested”.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.