Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 Pa. Super. 1 - Commonwealth v. El

273 Pa. Super. 1 - Commonwealth v. El’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
November 1996
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Goosby · Commonwealth v. Eiland · Commonwealth v. Perkins · Commonwealth v. Sparrow · Commonwealth v. Musto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant successfully petitioned the lower court for permission to withdraw his guilty plea and he cannot now be heard to complain that a subsequent prosecution placed him in double jeopardy. The defendant should not be permitted to benefit from his withdrawal of his guilty plea. If he is successful in withdrawing his guilty plea, there is no reason why he should not then face trial on the original charges as was done on this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]bviously, one who is on drugs and/or withdrawing from drugs may not have as good a recollection of certain incidents as a man who is going about his daily business”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.