Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 Pa. Super. 134 - Commonwealth v. Meischke

273 Pa. Super. 134 - Commonwealth v. Meischke’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2000

19 state decisions

1501979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Story · Commonwealth v. Amos · Commonwealth v. Raymond · Commonwealth v. Grace · Commonwealth v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well established that an appellate court may affirm the action of a lower court on a different rationale than that advanced by the lower court in support of its Order, Decree or Judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.