Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 S.C. 136 - Van Fore v. Cooke

Van Fore v. Cooke’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1973C (§ 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)

Relies on Knight v. Salisbury · Duncan v. County of York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he general law permits the general assembly to act to a very limited extent by special law in the establishment of each initial county government. See Code §§ 4-9-10(a) and 4-9-90 (1976). It does not, however, allow the general assembly to repeatedly inject its will into the operation of county government. While we recognize the necessity for compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, we conclude our constitution does not permit the general assembly to enact successive special legislation in an attempt to secure Justice Department sanction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.