¶1Upon a review of the certificate forwarded to us pursuant to Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and an examination of the applicable authorities, we must respectfully decline to answer the question. Boyer v. City of Orlando, Fla.1970, 232 So.2d 169; First National Bank & T. Co. v. Great American Ins. Co., Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 73; In re Adoption of Taylor, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 476; City of Hollywood v. Peck, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 842; Laytner v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 857; State v. Harris, Fla.1962, 136 So.2d 633. The question presented to us is one which the trial court has the power to adjudicate and *773which may be reviewed on appeal; furthermore, this court’s determination would not necessarily be dispositive of the case.
273 So. 2d 772
State v. Kanter
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 28, 1973
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1973-02-28
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1976
2 state decisions
Relies on 136 So. 2d 633 - State v. Harris · National Turpentine & Pulpwood Corp. v. Mills · 232 So. 2d 169 - Boyer v. City of Orlando
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1973-02-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →