Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 SW3D 322 - Roberts v. State

Roberts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana))

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Malik v. State · Boykin v. State · Hooper v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Now, if you believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, Rogelio Delacerda, in Harris County, Texas, on or about the 21st day of January, 1997, did then and there unlawfully and intentionally or knowingly shoot a firearm at an unknown person, intending or knowing that serious bodily injury or death would occur to an unknown person, but instead missed an unknown person and hit Jesus Roberto Contreras, causing the death of Jesus Roberto Contreras with the use of a deadly weapon, namely a firearm, then you will find the defendant guilty of murder, as charged in the indictment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A person is nevertheless criminally responsible for causing a result if the only difference between what actually occurred and what he desired, contemplated, or risked is that a different person or property was injured, harmed, or otherwise affected. • Now, if you believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that in Harris County, Texas, on or about the 5th day of January, 2012,- [appellant], and Cody Lee Evans and/or Michael Estrada, did then and there unlawfully and intentionally or knowingly or with criminal negligence -drive a motor vehicle at another person, intending or knowing that serious bodily injury would occur to the other person, but instead, struck a motor vehicle occupied by [A.D.], causing serious bodily injury to [A.D.], a child younger than fifteen years of age, then you find the defendant guilty of intentionally or knowingly causing seri ous bodily injury to a child yoxmger than fifteen years- of age, as- charged in the indictment. -”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “caused the death of another person. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02(b)(1). Capital murder requires proof that a person murdered more than one person during the same criminal transaction. See id. § 19.03(a)(7)(A).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.