Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 U.S. 202 - United States v. Noveck

United States v. Noveck’s Empirical Analysis

273 U.S. 202 · 1927

Citation profile

131
cited by 131 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 12 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 131 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Beacon Brass Co. (1952), Achilli v. United States (1957)

59 federal appellate · 12 district · 18 state decisions

37019271930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. William Rabinowich · Albrecht v. United States · Morgan v. Devine · United States v. Tynen · United States v. Yuginovich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he crime of perjury is complete when the oath is taken with the necessary intent, although the false affidavit is never used. [Citations.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whoever, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, shall willfully and contrary to such oath state or subscribe any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.