Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 U.S. 536 - Nixon v. Herndon

Nixon v. Herndon’s Empirical Analysis

273 U.S. 536 · 1927

Citation profile

647
cited by 647 later decisions
163
cited 163 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

176 federal appellate · 60 district · 59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 647 later decisions (163 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. (1970), Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1971)

176 federal appellate · 60 district · 59 state decisions — followed in 18 states

162019271930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Cannon v. United States · Strauder v. West Virginia · Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live · Ex parte Virginia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 647 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “objection that the subject-matter of the suit is political is little more than a play upon words. Of course the petition concerns political action but it alleges and seeks to recover for private damage. That private damage may be caused by such political action and may be recovered for in a suit at law hardly has been doubted for over two hundred years, . . . .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in no event shall a negro be eligible to participate in a democratic party primary election [held in that State],”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““. . . We find it unnecessary to consider the Fifteenth Amendment, because it seems to us hard to imagine a more direct and obvious infringement of the Fourteenth. That Amendment, while it applies to all, was passed, as we know, with a special intent to protect the blacks from discrimination against them. . . . The statute . . . assumes to forbid Negroes to take part in a primary election . . . discriminating against them by the distinction of color alone. States may do a good deal of classifying that it is difficult to believe rational, but there are limits, and it is too clear for extended argument that color cannot be made the basis of a statutory classification affecting the right set up in this case.” (pp. 540-541.) (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.