Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 U.S. 95 - McGuire v. United States

McGuire v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

273 U.S. 95 · 1927

Citation profile

211
cited by 211 later decisions
36
cited 36 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

64 federal appellate · 21 district · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 211 later decisions (36 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2014 · most notably Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1971), Massiah v. United States (1964)

64 federal appellate · 21 district · 56 state decisions — followed in 12 states

3701927193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Old Dominion Warehouse, Inc. (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Weeks v. United States · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Agnello v. United States · Burdeau v. McDowell · Gouled v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 211 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A criminal prosecution is more than a game in which the government may be checkmated and the game lost merely because its officers have not played according to rule.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Nor does the unlawful distraint or attachment of certain articles make unlawful the seizure of property otherwise rightfully taken at the same time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.