Teleguz v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
75
cited by 75 later decisions
4
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 67 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Kyles v. Whitley · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ajccurate photographs of a crime scene are not rendered inadmissible solely because they are gruesome, and autopsy photographs of the victim are admissible to show the atrociousness or vileness of a crime. Juniper [v. Common wealth], 271 Va. [362], 413, 626 S.E.2d [383], 415-16 [ (2006) ], Walton v. Commonwealth, 256 Va. 85, 92 , 501 S.E.2d 134, 138 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1046 , 119 S.Ct. 602 , 142 L.Ed.2d 544 (1998). Such photographs must nevertheless be excluded if their prejudicial effect substantially outweighs their probative value. Walker v. Commonwealth, 258 Va. 54, 69 , 515 S.E.2d 565, 574 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1125, 120 S.Ct. 955 , 145 L.Ed.2d 829 (2000). Such weighing is left to the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal, absent an abuse of discretion. Id.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]t any time he can pick up a phone when he has access to a phone and dial up a murder because he can call another Aleksey Safanov or another Edwin Gilkes or another Michael Hetrick. When a man can hire out a murder he can hire out a murder with a mere telephone when you have the abilities that Ivan Teleguz has shown.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n order to find that a violation of Napue occurred ..., we must determine first that the testimony [at issue] was false, second that the prosecution knew of the falsity, and finally that the falsity affected the jury's judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.