Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 ALA 116 - King v. Earley

King v. Earley’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphree v. Hanson · Turner v. Turner · Stratford v. City Council of Montgomery · Henderson v. Henderson · Minto v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Agency is determined by the facts, and not by how the parties may characterize the relationship. Purnell v. City of Florence, 27 Ala.App. 516 , 175 So. 417 . If the facts establish the relationship of principal and agent, the intention of the parties is immaterial, and the character of the relation is not affected by an agreement between the parties that an agency does not exist, or that some other relation does exist. Minto v. Moore, 1 Ala.App. 556 , 55 So. 542 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “' Story on Agency (8th Ed.) § 28. Every broker is, in a sense, an agent, but every agent is not a broker. There are, however, so many incidents common to both relations that it is difficult to define the precise line of demarcation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.