Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Ala. 450 - Beason v. Bowlin

Beason v. Bowlin’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2016

16 state decisions

60196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gilb v. O'Neill · Williams v. Massie · White v. Williams · Wells v. American Mortgage Co. of Scotland, Ltd. · Markstein v. Schilleci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must assert possessory rights distinct from those of others. The rule is generally stated that ' "[t]wo persons cannot hold the same property adversely to each other at the same time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.