Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Ark. 87 - Renton v. State

Renton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably David v. State (1988), White v. State (2006)

31 state decisions

17019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · Earl v. State · Bodde v. State · Cassell v. State · Williamson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with an applicable discovery rule or with an order issued pursuant thereto, the court may order such party to permit the discovery or inspection of materials not previously disclosed, grant a continuance, prohibit the party from introducing in evidence the material not disclosed, or enter such other order as it deems proper under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Rule 17.1 only allows a criminal defendant the opportunity to discover the state’s testimony prior to trial. As this court stated in Dupree v. State, supra, “[A] defendant in a criminal case cannot rely upon discovery as a total substitute for his own investigation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.