Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Conn. 321 - State v. Michael J.

State v. Michael J.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
6
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably Weinstein v. Weinstein (2005), State v. Bletsch (2007)

64 state decisions

260200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Sumner v. Mata · Palko v. State of Connecticut · Oregon v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when there is no evidence in the record to support it ... or when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant's motion for a mistrial constitutes a deliberate election on his part to forgo his valued right to have his guilt or innocence determined before the first trier of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Connecticut appellate courts never have held that the double jeopardy guarantees implied in the state constitution exceed those embodied in the federal constitution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.