State v. Miranda’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably State v. Salamon (2008), Stuart v. Stuart (2010)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Soberon v. United States · Bouie v. City of Columbia · In re Disbarment of Johnson · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Difronzo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that no one is deprived of liberty in violation of his or her constitutional rights . . . the application of the doctrine of res judicata . . . [is limited] to claims that actually have been raised and litigated in an earlier proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[u]nique policy considerations must be taken into account in applying the doctrine of res judicata to a constitutional claim raised by a habeas petitioner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t is more important that the court should be right upon later and more elaborate consideration of the cases than consistent with previous declarations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.