Loomis v. Priest’s Empirical Analysis
274 F.2d 513 · 1960
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 95A · 50 U.S.C. § 4330
Relies on Ex Parte Colonna No - Original Submitted on Motion for Leave to File Dec 8 1941 · United States v. The Antoinetta · Portland Tug & Barge Co. v. Upper Columbia River Towing Co. · Carpenter v. Title Insurance & Trust Co. · McLeod v. City of Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No suit pursuant to Sec. 9 ... may be instituted ... after the expiration of two years from the date of the seizure by or vesting in the Alien Property Custodian, as the case may be, of the property or interest in respect of which relief is sought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the language the sovereign used in giving up a portion of its immunity, and no conflicting considerations of equity may be entertained in judging the claim asserted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to be held, used, administered, liquidated, sold, or otherwise dealt with in the interest of and for the benefit of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.