Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 F.2d 556 - Pee v. United States

Pee v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

274 F.2d 556 · 1959

Citation profile

167
cited by 167 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 7 district · 81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 167 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2014 · most notably Gault (1967), Kent v. United States (1966)

61 federal appellate · 7 district · 81 state decisions — followed in 20 states

11101959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNabb v. United States · Mallory v. United States · Dendy v. Wilson · Rosenberg v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 167 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in effect he is exempt from the criminal law”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a child 16 years of age or over is charged with an offense which if committed by a person 18 years of age or over is a felony, or when a child under 18 years of age is charged with an offense which if committed by a person 18 years of age or over is punishable by death or life imprisonment, a judge may, after full investigation, waive jurisdiction and order the child held for trial under the regular procedure of the court which would have jurisdiction of the offense if committed by a person 18 years of age or over.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The constitutional safeguards vouchsafed a juvenile in such proceedings are determined from the requirements of due process and fair treatment, and not by the direct application of the clauses of the Constitution which in terms apply to criminal cases. (Footnote omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.