United States v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
274 F.3d 1007 · 2001
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably United States of America v. Joe Luis Saucedo-Munoz (2002), United States v. Lucas (2011)
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Cady v. Dombrowski · United States v. Harris · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Montoya De Hernandez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“constitutional issues should be decided on the most narrow, limited basis”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“per se unreasonable unless they fall within a few narrowly defined exceptions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonably suspect the traveler is smuggling contraband.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.