Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 F.3d 1354 - Bose Corporation v. Jbl Inc Infinity Systems Corporation

Bose Corporation v. Jbl Inc Infinity Systems Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

274 F.3d 1354 · 2001

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2018
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Old Chief v. United States · Warner-Jenkinson Company Inc v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co · Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross · Rite-Hite Corporation Hmh Hoj Rb We v. Kelley Company Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the scope of a claim would be reasonably ascertainable by those skilled in the art, then the claim is not indefinite.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]e apply regional circuit law to procedural issues that are not themselves substantive patent law issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.