Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 F.3d 204 - Jose Garcia Briseno v. Janie Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division

Jose Garcia Briseno v. Janie Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division’s Empirical Analysis

274 F.3d 204 · 2001

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anders v. California · Williams v. Taylor · Ake v. Oklahoma · Lockhart v. Fretwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.