Boyd v. Minnesota’s Empirical Analysis
274 F.3d 497 · 2001
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Murray v. Carrier · Estelle v. McGuire · Bousley v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“There is sufficient record evidence to support such a finding and, thus, it would not constitute an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented at trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“born alive and had an independent and separate existence from its mother”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. HEIGES
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.