274 F. Supp. 2d 136 - MacOne v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Casas Office Machines, Inc. v. Mita Copystar America, Inc. · Freeman v. Northwest Acceptance Corp. · Hawes v. Club Ecuestre El Comandante · Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Montle · Lundquist v. Precision Valley Aviation, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To acquire a domicile of choice in a place, a person must intend to make that place his home for the time at least ... There is no minimum period of residency required. A citizen of the United States can instantly transfer his citizenship from one state to another ... A person may have only one domicile at a time and, until a new one is acquired, the established one continues, ..., and, once acquired, the presumption is that it continues until changed. ... It has long been the rule that motive for the change in residence is irrelevant in determining domicile.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.