Brannen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Ruffin v. State (2008), State v. Johnson (2001)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · In re Draffin · Johnson v. State · Nelloms v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State concedes that the [41]-month delay is presumptively prejudicial, thus requiring this Court to inquire into the other factors that go into the balance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“entitled to strong evidentiary weight against the defendant....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he Supreme Court [of the United States] in Doggett held that "consideration of prejudice is not limited to the specifically demonstrable." [Cit.] The Court held that the presumption of prejudice that arises from the passage of time strengthens with the length of the delay and may tilt the prejudice factor in a defendant's favor, although it may not alone carry a Sixth Amendment claim without regard to the other Barker criteria. [Cit.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.