Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Ga. 582 - Hamilton v. State

Hamilton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Robinson v. State (2004), Fairclough v. State (2003)

43 state decisions

350200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. State · Chapman v. State · Mize v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a criminal defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficient performance so prejudiced the client that there is a reasonable likelihood that, but for counsel’s errors, the outcome of the trial would have been different. [Cits.] The criminal defendant must overcome the strong presumption that trial counsel’s conduct falls within the broad range of reasonable professional conduct. [Cit.] The trial court’s determination with respect to effective assistance of counsel will be affirmed unless the trial court’s [factual] findings are clearly erroneous. [Cit.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Because that testimony satisfied the basic foundational requirements, the trial court did not err in [admitting the photograph].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.