Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Ga. App. 106 - Smith v. State

274 Ga. App. 106 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2021

22 state decisions

150200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vansant v. State · Tate v. State · DeYoung v. State · Caffo v. State · Moss v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether probable cause exists for the issuance of a search warrant, the magistrate's task is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. This Court's review of the magistrate's decision is limited to determining if the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed to issue the search warrant. Substantial deference is afforded to a magistrate's decision to issue a search warrant based on a finding of probable cause.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The test for the sufficiency of a premises description is whether on its face it enables a prudent officer executing the warrant to locate the person and place definitely and with reasonable certainty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`child molestation and sexual exploitation of children in violation of OCGA § 16-12-100.2' was sufficient”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.