Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Ga. App. 120 - Stuart v. State

274 Ga. App. 120 - Stuart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hawes v. State · 266 Ga. App. 825 - Dye v. State · 262 Ga. App. 777 - Grier v. State · 199 Ga. App. 246 - Lee v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, when the appeal presents the earliest practicable opportunity to raise an ineffectiveness claim, and the claim is indeed raised for the first time on appeal, we remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue. Remand is not mandated, however, if we can determine from the record that [the defendant] cannot satisfy the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington. 13”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A charge of ineffective assistance of counsel is not judged by a standard of errorless counsel or by hindsight, but rather whether counsel rendered reasonably effective assistance; there is a critical distinction between inadequate preparation and unwise choices of trial tactics and strategy, which are not to be judged by hindsight or result. 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.