Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Ga. App. 659 - Bradford v. State

274 Ga. App. 659 - Bradford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 195 Ga. App. 732 - Morgan v. State · 217 Ga. App. 636 - Williams v. State · 217 Ga. App. 691 - Helton v. State · 207 Ga. App. 353 - Sims v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether probable cause exists for the issuance of a search warrant, the magistrate's task is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. This Court's review of the magistrate's decision is limited to determining if the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed to issue the search warrant. Substantial deference is afforded to a magistrate's decision to issue a search warrant based on a finding of probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When reviewing a trial court's decision on a motion to suppress, an appellate court's responsibility is to ensure that there was a substantial basis for the decision. The evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment, and the trial court's findings on disputed facts and credibility of witnesses are adopted unless they are clearly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he trial court has the discretion to modify its rulings on a motion in limine at any time....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.