Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Ga. App. 852 - Smith v. State

274 Ga. App. 852 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · O'NEAL v. State · 268 Ga. App. 246 - Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence [that] incidentally puts character in issue may be admitted if otherwise relevant. The evidence at issue here was relevant to explain why the officer decided to investigate [Pate]. That the evidence showed that [Pate] had [allegedly] committed similar crimes which piqued the officer’s suspicions does not change the result here. Testimony explaining the reason for [the investigation] need not be excluded simply because it incidentally shows the commission of another crime. 17”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.