Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 ILLAPP 19 - Knapik v. Stefek

Knapik v. Stefek’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1972
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Hubble · Fitzpatrick v. Papa · Goodwillie v. City of Lake View · Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. Milligan · St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Britz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * we find it was charged in the declaration that defendant with force of arms, maliciously and violently assaulted the plaintiff. Another paragraph charges that defendant with great force and violence, shook and pulled about the plaintiff and knocked him down to and upon the cement floor of plaintiff's place of business, and violently and maliciously kicked the plaintiff, and also with malice damaged plaintiff's clothes. While the special interrogatory may cover the issue as to the malicious conduct of defendant, it does not cover the charge that defendant knocked plaintiff down. The general verdict is responsive to the issue raised by this charge and is not inconsistent with the answer to the special interrogatory, which presented the question whether the defendant wilfully and maliciously injured the plaintiff."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.