Nottage v. Jeka’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 138 Ill. 2d 458 - Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant Church · 49 Ill. App. 3d 329 - Seniuta v. Seniuta · 95 Ill. App. 3d 220 - In Re Marriage of Reczek · 339 Ill. App. 371 - Pressney v. Pressney · 84 Ill. App. 3d 672 - In Re Marriage of Erby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is unassailable that where a trial court has subject matter jurisdiction of a case and personal jurisdiction over the parties and their attorneys, it retains that jurisdiction until 30 days have expired from the time of a dismissal. [Citations.] As an irrefutable corollary, so long as a section 508 petition is filed while an underlying action is pending or within 30 days from a dismissal of the underlying action, the trial court has jurisdiction to hear, decide and rule on the section 508 petition. (Cf. In re Marriage of Dague (1985), 136 Ill. App. 3d 297, 300 , 483 N.E.2d 322 ; In re Marriage of Conway (1986), 139 Ill. App. 3d 1062, 1065-66 , 487 N.E.2d 1240 .)” Nottage, 274 Ill. App. 3d at 242 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.