Page v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
80 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably Page v. State (1981), Brewer v. State (1981)
80 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baum v. State · Gardner v. State · Grey v. State · Jethroe v. State · Gee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Sentencing hearing in felony cases. Before sentencing a person for a felony the court must conduct a hearing to consider the facts and circumstances relevant to sentencing. The person is entitled to subpoena and call witnesses and otherwise to present information in his own behalf. The court shall make a record of the hearing, including: (1) A transcript of the hearing; (2) A copy of the presentence report; and (3) If the court finds aggravating circumstances or mitigating circumstances, a statement of the court's reasons for selecting the sentence that it imposes."”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Marquess v. State · Taylor v. State“"In order for the State to avoid a judgment on the evidence, a mere prima facie case must be demonstrated. In other words, a judgment on the evidence is-appropriate only where there is an absence of evidence upon some essential element or if the evidence is without conflict and is susceptible to but one inference which inference is in favor of the accused." (citations omitted).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Grimes v. State · Gillie v. State“"The sentencing record before us contains no statement concerning aggravating circumstances to support the imposition of the enhanced sentence as required by the statute. The cause is remanded therefore with instructions that the trial court enter his findings, if any, supporting the enhanced sentence, or in the alternative reduce defendant's sentence to the basic term of ten years."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hill v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.