Daniels v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Bieghler v. State (1985), Brown v. State (1981)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Ashton v. Anderson · Elmore v. State · Davis v. State · Lawrence v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Furthermore, this Court has held that the use of a list of property taxpayers which represented a reasonable cross-section of the county did not violate the rights of the accused, in the absence of a showing that the use of the list was a deliberate attempt to exclude certain groups from jury selection. Morris v. State, supra; Taylor v. State, (1973) 260 Ind. 264 , 295 N.E.2d 600 , cert. denied 414 U.S. 1012 , 94 S.Ct. 377 , 38 L.Ed.2d 250 . We have consistently held that jury selection systems are required to draw prospective jurors from a fair cross-section of the community and the burden of demonstrating purposeful discrimination is on defendant. Burr v. State, (1980) Ind., 403 N.E.2d 343 ; Holt v. State, (1977) 266 Ind. 586 , 365 N.E.2d 1209 . Jurors need not be mathematically proportioned to the character of the community and there is no requirement that any particular class be represented on every jury. Burr v. State, supra; Tewell v. State, (1976) 264 Ind. 88 , 339 N.E.2d 792 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bryan v. State“"It is well settled that instructions are to be considered with reference to each other and as an entirety, and error in a particular instruction will not justify a reversal unless the error is of such a nature that the whole charge of which it forms a part misleads the jury as to the law of the case. Porter v. State (1979) [271] Ind. [180], 891 N.E.2d 801 ; Ferrier v. State (1977), 266 Ind. 117 , 361 N.E.2d 150 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fleenor v. State“... [I)t is true that the language stating that the prior rape conviction could be considered to show a depraved sexual instinct was incorrect under the cireum-stances of this case where sodomy or incest had not been charged ... [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lehiy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.