Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 274 Ind. 342 - Cobb v. State

Cobb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
November 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Chambers v. Maroney · Brewer v. Williams · Michigan v. Mosley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A jury must determine beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence presented whether an accused did those specific acts which constituted the crime with which he was charged. In performing this guilt assessing task the jury must be oblivious to the legislature’s punishment scheme. To hold otherwise, we would be condoning verdicts in which the jury might compromise to the defendant’s benefit or detriment in order to reach a certain number of years of imprisonment. (emphasis in original)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “which appellant would require. Presumably, they made their decision with an eye toward the facts of the case as they found them to be.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Sequestration of the jury is mandatory only when the defendant faces the potential sentence of death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.